Seismic risk evaluation of urban areas

Martha L. Carreno, Omar D. Cardona, Alex H. Barbat

Abstract


Risk has been defined, for management purposes, as the potential economic, social and environmental consequences of hazardous events that may occur in a specified period of time. However, in the past, the concept of risk has been defined in a fragmentary way in many cases, according to each scientific discipline involved in its appraisal. From the perspective of this article, risk requires a multidisciplinary evaluation that takes into account not only the expected physical damage, the number and type of casualties or economic losses (direct impact), but also the conditions related to social fragility and lack of resilience conditions, which favour the second order effects (indirect impact) when a hazard event strike a urban centre. The urban seismic risk evaluation is proposed from a holistic point of view; that is, an integrated and comprehensive approach to guide decision-making. Evaluation of the potential physical damage (hard approach) as the result of the convolution of hazard and physical vulnerability of buildings and infrastructure is the first step of this method. Subsequently, a set of social context conditions that aggravate the physical effects are also considered (soft approach). In the method here proposed, the holistic risk evaluation is based on urban risk indicators. According to this procedure, a physical risk index is obtained, for each unit of analysis, from existing loss scenarios, whereas the total risk index is obtained by factoring the former index by an impact factor, based on variables associated with the socio-economic conditions of each unit of analysis. Finally, examples of the model application are given for two urban centres: Bogotá and Barcelona.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barbat, A. H. and Cardona, O. D., Vulnerability and Disaster Risk Indices from Engineering Perspective and Holistic Approach to Consider Hard and Soft Variables at Urban Level, IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, http://idea.unalmzl.edu.co, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales. 2003.

Cardona, O. D., Estimación Holística del Riesgo Sísmico utilizando Sistemas Dinámicos Complejos. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain. 2001.

Cardona, O. D. and Barbat, A. H., El Riesgo Sísmico y su Prevención, Cuaderno Técnico 5, Calidad Siderúrgica, Madrid. 2000.

Cardona, O.D. and Hurtado J.E., “Modelación Numérica para la Estimación Holística del Riesgo Sísmico Urbano, Considerando Variables Técnicas, Sociales y Económicas†1er Congreso de Métodos Numéricos en Ciencias Sociales, CIMNE-UPC, Noviembre 2000, Barcelona. 2000.

Carreño, M. L., Cardona, O. D. and Barbat, A., Sistema de indicadores para la evaluación de riesgos, Monografías de Ingeniería Sísmica, Editor A.H. Barbat, Monografía CIMNE IS-52. 2005.

ICC/CIMNE, An Advanced Approach to Earthquake Risk Scenarios with Applications to Different European Towns, WP08 Application to Barcelona, RISK-UE Project. 2004.

Masure, P., Variables and indicators of vulnerability and disaster risk for land-use and urban or territorial planning, IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, http://idea.unalmzl.edu.co Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales. 2003.

Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill Book Co., N.Y. 1980.

Saaty T. L., Decision making for leaders the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world, Pittsburgh RWS, USA. 2001.

UNDRO, Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Analysis, Report of Experts Group Meeting, Geneva. 1980.

Universidad de los Andes, Microzonificación Sísmica de Santa Fe de Bogotá, Ingeominas, 17 volumenes, Bogotá. 1996.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 INTERSECTII / INTERSECTIONS

Indexed

Google Scholar    Directory of Research Journals Indexing